Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2013

Anvil Mining Ltd. C. Association Canadienne Contre L’impunité, 2012 QCCA 117

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Québec Court of Appeal clarified the circumstances in which courts can hear a dispute based on events that take place or have an impact in more than one jurisdiction.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

In this decision, the Québec Court of Appeal (QCCA) clarified the circumstances in which courts can hear a dispute based on events that take place or have an impact in more than one jurisdiction.

The QCCA confirmed that assumption of jurisdiction requires a significant nexus between the forum seized of a dispute and either the subject matter of the litigation or the defendant. The decision is of particular relevance in our globalized environment, where corporations operate in a number of jurisdictions around the world.

The Association canadienne contre l'impunité© (ACCI), an association comprised of five NGOs based in Canada and abroad, sought to file a class action in Québec against Anvil Mining Limited (Anvil). The action was based on events that took place in October 2004 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) where Anvil, a company headquartered in Australia, was operating a silver-and-copper mine. The allegations centered on the role allegedly played

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from