Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2011

Anti-Wind Turbine Crusader's Case Comes To An End

Ian Hanna, an Ontario anti-wind crusader, has been denied permission to appeal an earlier court decision that dismissed his judicial review application.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

Ian Hanna, an Ontario anti-wind crusader, has been denied permission to appeal an earlier court decision that dismissed his judicial review application.

Hanna's application challenged Ontario Regulation 359/09 that governs renewable energy approvals in Ontario. The Regulation requires a 550 meter distance between wind turbines and noise receptors such as residences.

Hanna argued that there was no scientific basis for the 550 setback. He challenged the regulation on the basis that the Minister of Energy had not followed the necessary process required by Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR). Section 11 of the EBR requires the Minister to consider the Statement of Environmental Values (SEV) when making decisions that might significantly effect the environment. In turn, the SEV requires the Ministry to "use a precautionary, science-based approach in its decision-making". Hanna argued the Ministry had failed to meet that requirement when it determined the setback

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from