Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2014

Workplace Drug Dealing Provides After-Acquired Cause For Termination

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In most cases, employees who commit misconduct will face the consequences of their actions during their employment, in the form of discipline or even termination.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Employer had just cause based on evidence discovered after termination

In most cases, employees who commit misconduct will face the consequences of their actions during their employment, in the form of discipline or even termination for just cause. But, what if the employer only learns of an employee's misconduct after the employee is dismissed without cause? What recourse does the employer have?

The British Columbia Court of Appeal's ruling in Van den Boogaard v. Vancouver Pile Driving Ltd affirms that employers can rely on misconduct discovered after an employee's dismissal to establish "after-acquired" just cause.

Mr. Van den Boogaard was a project manager for Vancouver Pile Driving, a marine contracting company. He was in a supervisory role, which required him to oversee site safety. He was also required to enforce drug prohibition policies. Mr. Van den Boogaard's employment was eventually terminated without cause. However, he was not happy with the amount

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from