Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2017

Which Absences Properly "Count" For Attendance Management

The Federal Court of Appeal recently overturned a decision of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board (the "Board") concerning the National Attendance Management Policy...

CanadaEmployment and HR

Previously printed in the LexisNexis Labour Notes Newsletter.

The Federal Court of Appeal recently overturned a decision of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board (the "Board") concerning the National Attendance Management Policy (NAMP) promulgated by Correctional Service Canada (CSC) for its unionized employees: Bodnar v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada), 2017 FCA 171. The Board had determined that the NAMP discriminated against a group of employees because their absences related to disability and family reasons were counted for the purpose of comparing the employees' attendance records to a rolling average attendance rate for the workforce.

The applicable collective agreement included clauses granting employees paid sick leave and paid leave for family-related reasons. The latter clause permitted leave for a variety of reasons (e.g. school functions or appointments with legal or financial advisors) that would not attract a human

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from