Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 DECEMBER 2007

Tips For Enhancing The Enforceability Of Restrictive Covenants

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Covenants in restraint of trade, such as confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition covenants, are presumed to be unenforceable as against public policy. However, it is possible to rebut this presumption by showing that the particular covenant in question is reasonable.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Covenants in restraint of trade, such as confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition covenants, are presumed to be unenforceable as against public policy. However, it is possible to rebut this presumption by showing that the particular covenant in question is reasonable. The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in J.G. Collins Insurance Agencies Ltd. v. Elsley Estate1, established a three part test for assessing the reasonableness of a restrictive covenant as follows:

  1. Does the party relying upon the provision have a legitimate proprietary interest entitled to protection, having regard to the nature of the business and the character of the employment?;
  2. Are the temporal or spatial features of the covenant too broad, having regard to the nature of the proprietary interest, and its overall fairness to both parties?; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from