Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2015

The Most Important Question Is Why: The SCC Revisits Constructive Dismissal

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The Supreme Court of Canada recently handed down Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, ruling that an employer had constructively dismissed an employee when it suspended him without justification, while he was on sick leave.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Supreme Court of Canada recently handed down Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission,1 ruling that an employer had constructively dismissed an employee when it suspended him without justification, while he was on sick leave. This decision, which overruled both judgments from the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench and the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, clarifies the common law test for constructive dismissal and has important implications for employers. This article will focus on Justice Wagner's majority decision.2

Background

Mr. Potter was appointed to his position for a seven-year term as Executive Director of Legal Aid in New Brunswick. Halfway through the term, he and the employer began negotiating a buyout. The negotiations were ongoing when Mr. Potter went on sick leave. A week before Mr. Potter was due to return to work and unbeknownst to him, the employer had recommended his dismissal for cause. The employer then wrote to Mr. Potter's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from