Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 FEBRUARY 2016

The Final Word On Dependent Contractors

I wrote last year about the Ontario Superior Court of Justice's decision in the case of Keenan v. Canac Kitchens.

CanadaEmployment and HR

I wrote last year about the Ontario Superior Court of Justice's decision in the case of Keenan v. Canac Kitchens (a link to same can be found here:  http://www.employmentandlabour.com/?s=Canac).   Last week the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the Superior Court's decision in Canac, and added some additional guidance with respect to the law surrounding dependent contractor relationships.

First, a quick reminder as to the facts of this particular case.  Lawrence and Marilyn Keenan were employed by Canac Kitchens beginning in 1976 and 1983 respectively.  In 1987, both were advised that their employment was coming to an end but that they could carry on as independent contractors.  An independent contractor agreement was signed by Marilyn and the Keenans carried on as before.  They continued working for Canac until the company closed its operations in 2009.  No notice of termination or pay in lieu of notice was provided.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from