Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2013

Tattoo And Body Piercing Rule Unreasonable

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

An Ontario arbitrator has decided an issue of increasing concern to employers everywhere in regards to tattoos and body piercing.

CanadaEmployment and HR

An Ontario arbitrator has decided an issue of increasing concern to employers everywhere – what can be done about tattoos and body piercings?  The answer:  not much, without objective evidence of an adverse effect on your business.

The Ottawa Hospital introduced a comprehensive dress code policy requiring, among other things, that employees cover up large tattoos and remove "visible, excessive" body piercings. The union grieved the dress code policy as an unreasonable infringement on employees' right to express themselves through their appearance.  The arbitrator agreed with the union and struck down the policy.

An employer rule imposed on a unionized workforce must be reasonable, clear, and consistently enforced. Rules concerning dress and appearance are generally reasonable where there is objective evidence of a legitimate business interest at stake. The arbitrator noted that in the context of a public health care provider, delivering the best possible health

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from