Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2020

Supreme Court Strikes Down Uber's Arbitration Clause In Uber Technologies Inc. V. Heller, 2020 SCC 16

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

On June 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the arbitration clause in Uber's standard form driver contracts, which requires disputes to be resolved through mediation and arbitration...

CanadaEmployment and HR

On June 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the arbitration clause in Uber's standard form driver contracts, which requires disputes to be resolved through mediation and arbitration in the Netherlands, was unconscionable and thus invalid. As a result, Ontario's Uber drivers may now bring claims against the technology giant in a court in Ontario.

Background

David Heller is a driver for UberEats. To become a driver for UberEats, he had to accept, without negotiation, the terms of Uber's standard form services agreement. A clause within this agreement states that Uber drivers must resolve any disputes they have with Uber through an arbitration process in the Netherlands that would cost the Uber driver US$14,500 in up-front administrative and filing fees. This does not include legal fees, travel expenses or other costs of participation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from