Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2013

Sober Second Thought: Supreme Court Rules On Random Drug And Alcohol Testing

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Organizations and employees alike should take note of the long awaited ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper, Limited, which was recently released.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Organizations and employees alike should take note of the long awaited ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) in Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper, Limited, which was released on Friday, June 14, 2013. Irving is the first decision from Canada's highest court to consider random drug and alcohol testing in the workplace.

The SCC attempted to confine its reasons to the unionized context in which Irving arose. However, the court's comments regarding the status of drug and alcohol testing in the workplace, the balance between workplace safety and employee privacy, and the need for employers to justify the implementation of drug and alcohol testing policies even in dangerous work environments, may have broader implications that extend to both union and non-union workplaces. Further, although the facts of Irving concerned random alcohol testing, the court's reasons appear to encompass random drug testing as well.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from