Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 OCTOBER 2010

Shaw v. Phipps

The applicant at the Human Rights Tribunal, a black male, was a letter carrier with Canada Post.

CanadaEmployment and HR

[2010] O.J. No. 4283 (Div. Ct.), Released 6 October 2010

Administrative Law – Standard of Review of Decisions of the HRTO – Human Rights – Prima Facie Discrimination on the Basis of Race

The applicant at the Human Rights Tribunal, a black male, was a letter carrier with Canada Post. It was his second day delivering mail in an affluent neighbourhood in Toronto. He was wearing his Canada Post coat and was carrying a satchel used by letter carriers.

In response to a number of recent break-and-enters in the area, the respondent Officer Shaw was patrolling the area with a new constable, Officer Noto. Officer Shaw alleged that when he first observed the applicant, he saw him crossing back and forth across the street in a suspicious manner. Both officers also testified that they observed the applicant approach a house, knock on the door, and speak to a woman without delivering any mail.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from