Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2025

Return-To-Office Mandate Triggers Constructive Dismissal (… This Time)

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In Nickles v 628810 Alberta Ltd.[1] ("Nickles"), the Court of King's Bench of Alberta found that an employer's return-to-office mandate constituted grounds for constructive dismissal of an employee with a longstanding work-from-home arrangement

CanadaEmployment and HR

In Nickles v 628810 Alberta Ltd.1 ("Nickles"), the Court of King's Bench of Alberta found that an employer's return-to-office mandate constituted grounds for constructive dismissal of an employee with a longstanding work-from-home arrangement.

Background

The employee in Nickles primarily worked from home as an office manager from 1986 to 2023. During this 37-year period, she attended the office when needed, but mostly at her own discretion. There was no dispute that her role was a work from home position.

However, following an ownership change, the employer introduced a so-called return-to-office mandate requiring the employee to work in the office on a full-time basis. The employer gave the employee less than three months of notice to comply with this mandate. The employee argued that this was not a "return" to the office, but rather a significant change to her longstanding remote role.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from