Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2011

Re Indalex Limited: A Question Of Priorities

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Re Indalex Limited (Indalex) in April has raised a number of questions about the strength of secured creditors’ interests, and the scope of an employer’s duty as administrator of a pension plan under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Re Indalex Limited(Indalex) in April has raised a number of questions about the strength of secured creditors' interests, and the scope of an employer's duty as administrator of a pension plan under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). This article focuses on the decision's pension law implications for employers. While the decision is generally unfavourable for employers, the silver lining may be that the particular facts influencing the decision could limit its future application.

Background

Indalex Limited (Indalex Canada) sponsored and administered two defined benefit (DB) pension plans, one for eligible unionized employees (Union Plan), and the other for eligible executives (Executive Plan).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from