Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2012

Random Alcohol Testing Case Headed For Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of Canada will decide whether an employer must have "reasonable cause" to conduct random alcohol testing on unionized employees, or whether an inherently dangerous workplace is sufficient to justify random alcohol testing.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Supreme Court of Canada will decide whether an employer must have "reasonable cause" to conduct random alcohol testing on unionized employees, or whether an inherently dangerous workplace is sufficient to justify random alcohol testing.

In the case, a unionized Irving Pulp and Paper employee, who occupied a safety sensitive position, was randomly tested for alcohol using a breathalyser. The test revealed a blood alcohol level of zero. Nevertheless, the union filed a policy grievance challenging the provision of the policy that permitted random alcohol testing "without cause".

The New Brunswick Court of Appeal decided that Irving's kraft paper mill was an inherently dangerous workplace, and that Irving did not have to prove that there was an existing alcohol problem in the workplace in order to conduct random alcohol testing.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from