Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 DECEMBER 2018

Pensions And Benefits Part 2: Key Case-Law Developments In Canada

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

As discussed at our last A.M. Pension Webinar on December 11, 2018, there have been a number of significant legislative and case-law developments in the area of pensions and benefits law in 2018.

CanadaEmployment and HR

As discussed at our last A.M. Pension Webinar on December 11, 2018, there have been a number of significant legislative and case-law developments in the area of pensions and benefits law in 2018. In Part I of a two-part blog post, we discussed some of the key legislative developments in Ontario and the federal jurisdiction. In this post, we highlight some of the key case-law developments in Canada.

Challenges under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Lubianesky v. Gazdag (Alberta)

In Lubianesky v. Gazdag, Ms. Lubianesky sought a declaration that the provisions in Alberta's Employment Pension Plans Act ("EPPA") that allowed only married spouses, not common-law spouses, to agree to divide benefits on relationship breakdown violated the equality provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") on the grounds of marital status.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from