Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2010

Ontario Report - The Dependent Contractor

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In the case of McKee v. Reid Heritage Homes, the Court of Appeal has now confirmed the intermediate category of the dependent contractor.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In the case of McKee v. Reid Heritage Homes,1 the Court of Appeal has now confirmed the intermediate category of the dependent contractor. As a result, employers must now provide reasonable notice upon termination for both employees and dependent contractors. Employers, in order to be aware of the defining features between an employee, an independent contractor, and the new intermediary category of the dependent contractor, need to take a closer look at the essence of the relationships with workers.

McKee v. Reid Heritage Homes

In 1987, Reid Heritage Homes, a new home builder, entered into a handwritten contract with Elizabeth McKee agreeing that McKee would sell 69 homes for Reid, exclusively and in exchange for commission. The agreement included a termination provision providing that with 30 days' notice, either party could end the agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from