Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2021

Important Decision On Family Status Discrimination

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In Kovintharajah v Paragon Linen & Laundry Services Inc., 2021 HRTO 98 ("Paragon Linen") the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the "Tribunal") provided clarity on the test for family status...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In Kovintharajah v Paragon Linen & Laundry Services Inc., 2021 HRTO 98 ("Paragon Linen") the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the "Tribunal") provided clarity on the test for family status discrimination and awarded one of the highest ever damages awards for this class of discrimination.

Requests for accommodation on the basis of family status have been on the rise for all municipal employers in response to the additional pressures on families caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This important decision offers insight to municipal employers on how to navigate family status accommodation.

The Facts

The applicant worked as a machine operator at the respondent's commercial laundry facility. The applicant and his wife had three young children aged 6, 4 and 2, and also lived with his wife's elderly parents. The applicant's in-laws had significant health and mobility issues and were not able to care for the children for more than a few minutes at a time. As a result,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from