Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2025

Employment Termination Clauses: Lessons From Singh v Clark Builders

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

In a recent decision, the Court of King's Bench of Alberta upheld a freely negotiated termination clause with a sophisticated employee despite evolution to the employee's role over the term of employment.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In a recent decision, the Court of King's Bench of Alberta upheld a freely negotiated termination clause with a sophisticated employee despite evolution to the employee's role over the term of employment. The employee's experience and involvement in the negotiations may also be used to resolve any apparent ambiguity in the termination clause.

In Singh v Clark Builders, 2025 ABKB 3,1 the Court upheld a termination clause limiting the employee's notice entitlement to 90 days, despite the employee's promotion from Vice President to Chief Operating Officer.

Key Facts and The Termination Clause

Mr. Singh, a seasoned executive, was recruited by Clark Builders (the Company) after nearly a year of negotiations. After rejecting multiple earlier offers, Mr. Singh signed an Offer of Employment and a separate contract, which he personally negotiated. The termination clause he proposed, and was accepted by the Company, specified a 90-day notice period for termination

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from