Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2012

Employee Denied Damages For Failure To Return To Work When Called Back

Earl Chevalier was employed by Active Green + Ross for 33 years and was a service centre manager for 18 of those years.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Earl Chevalier was employed by Active Green + Ross for 33 years and was a service centre manager for 18 of those years. On October 28, 2008, he was notified that he was being temporarily laid off from his job at the end of the month. When Mr. Chevalier later commenced an action for wrongful dismissal, his employer called back stating that it had acted under the mistaken belief that it could lay off Mr. Chevalier. Mr. Chevalier however refused to return to work and decided to continue with this litigation.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that Mr. Chevalier was constructively dismissed when he was laid off by Active Green + Ross on October 28, 2008. Accordingly, he was entitled to notice in the range of 18 to 24 months. However, the Court found that Mr. Chevalier failed to mitigate his damages when he refused to return to work.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from