Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2011

Costs Or No Costs? Reasonable Or Correct?

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

While federally regulated employers may not have been waiting with bated breath for the long-coming outcome of Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) and Mowat v Canada (AG)1 ("Mowat"), it will permit them to breathe a little easier. In Mowat, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal does not have the ability to award costs to a successful complainant under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

CanadaEmployment and HR

While federally regulated employers may not have been waiting with bated breath for the long-coming outcome of Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) and Mowat v Canada (AG)1 ("Mowat"), it will permit them to breathe a little easier. In Mowat, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal does not have the ability to award costs to a successful complainant under the Canadian Human Rights Act. More importantly, it also held that the Tribunal's decision was subject to review on a standard of reasonableness, but that its decision was unreasonable.

SCC on costs

Mowat was a member of the Canadian Forces who filed a varied complaint about her treatment as a female. Ultimately she was awarded $4,000 for sexual harassment to compensate for "suffering in respect of feelings or self respect." The Tribunal proceeded to consider her claim for legal costs. It awarded her $47,000 for costs, a decision that was upheld by the Federal Court but

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from