Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2022

Continuous Video Surveillance Of Employees: Psychological Harassment?

Case law recognizes that constant and continuous video surveillance of employees may constitute an unreasonable working condition, and thus violate section 46 of ...

CanadaEmployment and HR

Case law recognizes that constant and continuous video surveillance of employees may constitute an unreasonable working condition, and thus violate section 46 of Québec's Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"), when not justified in a rational and proportionate manner according to the circumstances.

In the case of Lazzer  v. Magasin Baseball Town inc.,1 rendered on February 3, 2022, rather than having to determine whether the presence of cameras constituted an unreasonable working condition within the meaning of the Charter, the Administrative Labour Tribunal ("Tribunal") had to rule on the merits of complaints of psychological harassment filed in this context.

Facts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from