Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2015

BCCA Clarifies McKinley: "Contextual Approach" And Prior Discipline

In a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision released in late April 2014, a trial judge's decision was set aside and a new trial ordered.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In a British Columbia Court of Appeal decision released in late April 2014, a trial judge's decision was set aside and a new trial ordered. The trial judge's decision in Ogden v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 2014 BCSC 285 (CanLII) provided the Court of Appeal with an opportunity to clarify the law of cumulative cause in Ogden v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 2015 BCCA 175. (CanLII) As always, we encourage readers to review the cases for more detail in the specific facts and areas of law covered by the courts. Our comments on the case follow.

What happened?

The Employee, Gulyun Ogden, was a financial advisor who worked for CIBC from 2004 until her termination for cause in 2011. Her work portfolio consisted of others who, like her, emigrated from China. She was terminated "for cause" by CIBC in March 2011 after an investigation into a transaction that had occurred in September 2010. At that time, Ms. Ogden received a phone call from a client who wanted to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from