Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 OCTOBER 2011

Arbitrator's Decision Sheds Light On Responding To Workplace Threats Under Bill 168

In June 2010, Bill 168 introduced significant amendments to the "Occupational Health and Safety Act" (OHSA) as it relates to violence in the workplace.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In June 2010, Bill 168 introduced significant amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) as it relates to violence in the workplace. As one of the first decisions to deal with the Bill 168 amendments in detail, Arbitrator Elaine Newman's award in Kingston (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 109 underscores the new obligations of employers in responding to threats made in the workplace. Arbitrator Newman upheld an employer's decision to terminate an employee for making a death threat to a co-worker, and found that employers must react to workplace threats in much the same way that they would react to workplace violence.

Facts

The grievor was a 47 year old employee with 28 years of seniority. In the years prior to the incident, the grievor's employment relationship had been punctuated by a history of some tension and anger, including past warnings for arguing with and shouting at a supervisor, and angrily confronting a co-worker.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from