Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2018

Age Discrimination In Employer's Group Benefit Plans

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

In May 2018, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the "Tribunal") released an interim decision which concluded that exceptions in the Human Rights Code (the "Code") ...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In May 2018, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) released an interim decision which concluded that exceptions in the Human Rights Code (the “Code”) which permit the termination of benefits for workers over age 65 infringe the equality rights protected under section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and are unconstitutional.

The Tribunal’s interim decision in Talos v. Grand Erie District School Board, 2018 HRTO 680 (CanLII) presents a significant shift in the law and may well have ramifications for both unionized and non-unionized workplaces that provide benefit plans with age limitations and exclusions assuming more broad application.

By way of background, Mr. Talos was a teacher employed by the school board. He continued to work on a full-time basis past age 65. In accordance with the collective agreement between the school board and the union, entitlement to extended health, dental, and life insurance benefits ceased at age

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from