Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2026

104 Absences Later: When Innocent Absenteeism Justifies Termination

Regular attendance is essential in any workplace, but it is especially critical in operations that rely on scheduled shifts, such as transit services. A recent British Columbia arbitration decision involving Prince George...

CanadaEmployment and HR

To listen to an audio recording of this article, click here.

Regular attendance is essential in any workplace, but it is especially critical in operations that rely on scheduled shifts, such as transit services. A recent British Columbia arbitration decision involving Prince George Transit Ltd. ("PGT") and one of its drivers (the "Grievor") highlights the challenges employers face when dealing with excessive absenteeism and how they should respond in such situations.

Prince George Transit Ltd. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 31, 2025 CanLII 124344, demonstrates that even "innocent" absences arising for legitimate reasons can accumulate to a level that seriously disrupts operations and justify termination where the employee cannot maintain reliable attendance or demonstrate that they are capable of regular attendance.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from