Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2019

$9.5 Billion Dollar Claim To Enforce Judgment Dismissed

Siskinds LLP
Explore more from Siskinds LLP

On Thursday, April 4, 2019 the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the attempts of Ecuador's Lago Agrio Region requiring Chevron to pay for water and soil contamination relating to Texaco's activities in the area.

CanadaEmployment and HR
Paula Lombardi
Paula Lombardi
Author LinkedIn connections

On Thursday, April 4, 2019 the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the attempts of Ecuador's Lago Agrio Region requiring Chevron to pay for water and soil contamination relating to Texaco's activities in the area. The contamination was caused by Texaco's activities between the years 1964 and 1992. Chevron acquired Texaco in 2001.

In 2011 the villagers of the Lago Agrio Region obtained a judgment against Chevron in Equador. Chevron however has no assets in Ecuador and the villagers have been attempting to turn to the courts in the United States, Canada, Brazil and Argentina to enforce the decision.

In 2017 the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that Chevron Canada was a separate entity from its parent company and because of that its share and assets could not be seized to enforce the judgment issued by the Ecuadorian court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Tariffs, Terminations And EI: Implications Of Canada’s New Support Package For Employers

Canada's federal government has announced a $3.5 billion rapid response support package in anticipation of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, introducing new temporary employment insurance measures and workforce retention programs. The package extends EI benefits, waives waiting periods, and creates funding opportunities for employers to retain and retrain workers rather than implement large-scale layoffs.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Siskinds LLP
Siskinds LLP
Article

Silva v. Royal Bank Of Canada: A Cautionary Tale About Terminating For Cause

A financial planner's wrongful dismissal case against RBC resulted in over $2.5 million in damages after the bank filed an inaccurate termination notice that destroyed her career prospects. The Ontario Superior Court found the bank's conduct vindictive and its allegations of cause unproven, raising critical questions about employer obligations when reporting terminations in the investment industry.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
Article

Unsubstantiated Findings In Workplace Investigations: What To Do When You Can’t Decide

When workplace investigators face difficult decisions, many default to marking allegations as "unsubstantiated" to avoid risk. However, this seemingly safe approach carries significant organizational costs, undermines complainant trust, and often stems from insufficient training in credibility assessment and the balance of probabilities standard.
CanadaEmployment and HR
RT Workplace Training & Consulting Inc.
RT Workplace Training & Consulting Inc.
Article

Tariffs, Terminations And EI: Implications Of Canada’s New Support Package For Employers

Canada's federal government has announced a $3.5 billion rapid response support package in anticipation of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, introducing new temporary employment insurance measures and workforce retention programs. The package extends EI benefits, waives waiting periods, and creates funding opportunities for employers to retain and retrain workers rather than implement large-scale layoffs.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Siskinds LLP
Siskinds LLP
Article

Ontario Court Certifies Proposed Class Action Against Hatts Off Inc.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has certified a proposed class action against Hatts Off Inc., alleging systemic abuse, neglect and misconduct at youth group homes and foster placements across Ontario spanning nearly four decades. With approximately 180 individuals already identified as potential class members, this certification decision allows the case to proceed on common issues affecting all proposed class members, though the allegations remain unproven and liability is denied by the defendants.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Siskinds LLP
Siskinds LLP