Introduction
Fraud continues to plague businesses and individuals in Canada
and abroad, increasing at an alarming rate. Those involved in asset
recovery frequently turn to the equitable doctrine of knowing
assistance to catch "strangers" to the fraud but with
actual knowledge of it. Many times assets are held by these
strangers and are the main means of recovery. But what happens when
two sets of victims are pitted against each other suggesting one
set of victims are liable for knowing assistance?
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) is set to determine this issue
in a case from Ontario.
The SCC recently granted leave to appeal from the Ontario Court
of Appeal's decision in DBDC Spadina Ltd v Walton, 2018 ONCA
60, a case involving a complex multiparty multi-mil lion dollar
real estate fraud1. The Ontario Court of Appeal extended
the doctrines of knowing assistance and corporate identification
effectively to prioritize one set of innocent fraud victims over
another.