Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2015

Attempting To Pull The Wool Over A Judgment Creditor's Eyes

The recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision 1007374 Alberta Ltd v Ruggieri, is an interesting case that affirms an important trial court decision on fraudulent conveyances and oppression.

CanadaCriminal Law

The recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision 1007374 Alberta Ltd v Ruggieri, is an interesting case that affirms an important trial court decision on fraudulent conveyances and oppression. While not a dramatic reframing of the law in these issues, it does highlight the willingness of the courts to sanction those who attempt to "creditor-proof" their companies to escape judgment enforcement.

The facts are that in 2011, the respondent in the Court of Appeal decision had successfully sued
A. Ruggieri Engineering Ltd. ("Ruggieri Ltd."), a corporation solely owned and operated by Antonio Ruggieri. Although there was no appeal of the decision by the defendant corporation, by the time the respondent attempted to enforce the judgment he learned that the appellants had filed for a name change. They had also granted general security agreements and promissory notes in favour of Antonio Ruggieri and another corporation of which Mr. Ruggieri happened to be the sole director.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from