Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2018

Smart Contracts (Part 2): Intermediaries? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Intermediaries!

In Part 1, we looked at smart contracts, and how "smart" they really are – if you need some background, start there.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In Part 1, we looked at smart contracts, and how "smart" they really are – if you need some background, start there.

Smart contracts (or "programmatically executed transactions") have been touted as a possible solution to a range of business problems, as well as the death knell for intermediaries. By deploying DLT on a private shared ledger, the power of the blockchain is harnessed to leapfrog past traditional intermediaries. This enables more efficient transactions, free from the constraints and incremental expenses imposed by banks, auditors, governments, regulators, lawyers, accountants and others who take a pound of flesh from the transaction workflow.

By shuffling off the intermediaries, the smart contract is free to move efficiently in the economy, saving time and money for participants. To adapt a phrase from the Humphrey Bogart vehicle The Treasure of Sierra Madre: Intermediaries? We don't need no stinkin' intermediaries! At least... that's the current

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from