Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2021

Silence Is Not Golden When It Comes To Contracts

The Supreme Court recently undertook to further refine the duty of honest performance in contract law.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Case Study: C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger1

The Supreme Court recently undertook to further refine the duty of honest performance in contract law. In a significant ruling on December 18, 2020, the Court held that this duty of honest contractual performance extends beyond lies to include knowingly misleading another party, whether through a partial truth, an omission, or even silence.

Background

C.M. Callow Inc. is a company that contracted with several condominium corporations known together as Baycrest to provide summer and winter maintenance services. The specifics of the arrangement between the parties was outlined within two separate contractual agreements; a summer contract that was set to expire in October 2013, and a winter contract that was set to expire in April 2014. Baycrest decided to terminate their winter contract with C.M. Callow in early 2013, however, in spite of a termination clause in the agreement that allowed Baycrest to terminate for any

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from