Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2016

Lessons From Rona/Lowe's

Lowe's original proposal did not proceed in part due to the Québec government's concerns about the effect of the transaction on Rona's stakeholders and the Québec economy more generally.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In a vindication of the Rona board's business judgment, on February 3, 2016, Lowe's agreed to acquire Rona for $24 per share in cash – a 65% premium to Lowe's July 2012 unsolicited $14.50 proposal that was rejected by Rona's board, and a 104% premium to the pre-announcement share price.

Lowe's original proposal did not proceed in part due to the Québec government's concerns about the effect of the transaction on Rona's stakeholders and the Québec economy more generally.

While board entrenchment and excessive governmental protectionism are to be avoided, there are many instances in which the board's long-term business judgment in respect of value and other stakeholder interests, as well as the government's legitimate concern about the economic impact of a transaction, turn out to be warranted. In this case, shareholders are receiving a much higher premium than they would have under the original proposal. Lowe's has also made a number of important commitments,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from