Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2012

Donut Wars Part II - Dunkin' Donuts

The decisions in Tim Hortons and Dunkin' Donuts provide an important lesson for franchisors and franchisees alike.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

On June 21, 2012, the Honourable Daniel H. Tingley of the Quebec Superior Court issued a 43 page judgment which ordered Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd. (the "Franchisor") to pay 21 of its franchisees in Quebec (the "Franchisees") an aggregate sum of almost $16.5 million, plus interest and costs, for having failed "to protect and enhance the Dunkin Donuts brand in Quebec." The decision in Bertico Inc. et al v. Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd. [Dunkin' Donuts] was a resounding victory for the Franchisees. The outcome in Dunkin' Donuts contrasts sharply with the Fairview Donut Inc. and Brule Foods Ltd. v. The TDL Group Corp. and Tim Hortons Inc. [Tim Hortons] decision, recently examined by this author, where Tim Hortons Inc. obtained summary judgment in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against efforts by franchisees to certify a class action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from