Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JANUARY 2014

Case Note: Bombardier Inc v AS Estonian Air, 2014 ONCA 41

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Bombardier alleged that the Republic of Estonia induced Estonian Air to breach its contract with Bombardier, intentionally interfering with its economic relations.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Facts: Bombardier alleged that the Republic of Estonia induced Estonian Air to breach its contract with Bombardier, intentionally interfering with its economic relations. Bombardier therefore sought to bring the Republic before the courts of Ontario by invoking the "commercial activity" exception as described in s. 5 of the Federal State Immunity Act, RSC 1985, c S-18 (the "Act").

The commercial activity exception provides that a foreign state is not immune from the jurisdiction of Canadian courts "in any proceedings that relate to any commercial activity of the foreign state." "Commercial activity" is defined as "any particular transaction, act or conduct or any regular course of conduct that by reason of its nature is of a commercial character."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from