Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2014

Case Note: "2148251 Ontario Incorporated v Catan Canada Incorporated", 2014 ONCA 57

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Facts: A promissory note, dated April 25, 2008, was executed in favour of 2148251 Ontario Incorporated as payee by Catan as payor and Duscio as guarantor.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Facts: A promissory note, dated April 25, 2008, was executed in favour of 2148251 Ontario Incorporated ("Keystone") as payee by Catan as payor and Duscio as guarantor. Interest payable both before and after maturity was never paid and an unsuccessful demand for payment was made on May 31, 2010. Catan and Duscio argued that the claim, issued on April 20, 2011, was time-barred because the limitation period began to run when Catan failed to make the first interest payment, due on June 25, 2008.

The motion judge sided with Keystone, finding that the limitation period did not begin to run until the date of the demand, since the note provided that it was payable "on demand after maturity date or at the discretion of the payee on the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) if the Payor does not pay when due any of its obligations to the Payee... ."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from