Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 AUGUST 2012

Advance Notice Policies On The Rise

As shareholder activism increases in Canada, the mechanics of proxy disputes are becoming increasingly refined and more frequently tested.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

As shareholder activism increases in Canada, the mechanics of proxy disputes are becoming increasingly refined and more frequently tested. In the recent decision of Northern Minerals Investment Corp. v. Mundoro Capital Inc., 2012 BCSC 1090, the Supreme Court of British Columbia considered two of the tools used by issuers in connection with proxy contests:

  • the implementation of an "advance notice policy", And
  • the postponement of a shareholder meeting.

In sustaining both initiatives by the Mundoro board, the court reaffirmed the authority of boards to pursue such initiatives - providing commentary on the principles that should inform courts' approaches to the use of such tools in proxy fights and the key factors that may influence the courts' views going forward - and suggesting an inclination to support advance notice by-laws and policies as a means of enhancing informed shareholder choice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from