Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2026

John F. Rook, KC On Canada’s Merger Efficiency Defence

Businesses planning mergers or acquisitions in Canada are operating in a more difficult regulatory environment — and the Competition Bureau’s draft Merger Enforcement Guidelines leave a central question about the merger efficiency defence in Canada unresolved.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

Businesses planning mergers or acquisitions in Canada are operating in a more difficult regulatory environment — and the Competition Bureau’s draft Merger Enforcement Guidelines leave a central question about the merger efficiency defence in Canada unresolved.

Senior counsel John F. Rook, KC has co-authored an Intelligence Memo for the C.D. Howe Institute examining what the Competition Bureau’s draft Merger Enforcement Guidelines (MEGs) say about efficiency — and what they leave unanswered. Co-authored with economist Larry Schwartz, a past member of the Competition Tribunal, the memo was published on March 25, 2026.

What the Draft MEGs Say About the Merger Efficiency Defence

Recent amendments to the Competition Act removed the section 96 efficiency defence and introduced a structural presumption: where post-merger market share exceeds 30 percent and the HHI exceeds 1,800, a merger is presumptively anti-competitive. What replaces the efficiency defence — section 93(h), the “any

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from