Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2012

Alberta Court Releases Important Decision On Costs For Competition Law Private Actions

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

On February 7, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench released the first reported decision on a party’s entitlement to costs under section 36 of the Competition Act (Act), which confers a private right of action for any person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of a breach of a criminal provisions of the Act.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

On February 7, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench released the first reported decision on a party's entitlement to costs under section 36 of the Competition Act (Act), which confers a private right of action for any person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of a breach of a criminal provisions of the Act.

Further to the Court's decision to award damages to a company that had lost a business opportunity as a result of a breach of the conspiracy provision of the Act, the plaintiff sought costs, including solicitor-client and investigation costs, under section 36 of the Act.

With respect to the claim for solicitor-client's costs, the plaintiff argued that the wording of section 36 supported an award for such costs. Section 36 of the Act provides that any person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of a breach of a criminal provision of the Act may sue to recover damages, together with "the full cost to him of any investigation in connection with the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from