Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2022

Interim Receivership Orders: Cross-Undertaking Requirement Clarified

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

On 11 May 2022, a judgment by the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal in JTrust Asia PTE. Ltd. v Mitsuji Konoshita et al and Showa Holdings provided fresh guidance on the circumstances...

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 11 May 2022, a judgment by the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal inJTrust Asia PTE. Ltd. v Mitsuji Konoshita et al and Showa Holdings provided fresh guidance on the circumstances where upon application by a claimant to appoint interim receivers, a cross-undertaking in damages will be required as a condition of the grant.

Background

The Appellant, JTrust Asia PTE. Ltd. ("JTrust") is a company incorporated in Singapore. The first respondent, Mitsuji Konoshita, is a director and majority shareholder of the second respondent, A.P.F. Group Co. Ltd. ("APF") (together, "the Respondents"). The intervenor, Showa Holdings Co. Ltd ("Showa"), for whom Maples and Calder, the Maples Group's law firm, acts in the proceedings, is a Japanese holding company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange and a subsidiary of APF.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from