Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2016

Forum Challenges In The BVI – A Forensic Exercise

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

The BVI Court of Appeal has recently given further guidance on the application of the established principles of forum non conveniens in the context of a claim brought in tort against certain BVI incorporated companies.

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The BVI Court of Appeal has recently given further guidance on the application of the established principles of forum non conveniens in the context of a claim brought in tort against certain BVI incorporated companies.

In Anjie Investments Limited -v- Cheng Nga Yee the Claimants brought proceedings in the BVI Commercial Court alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, as a result of which, they alleged, they transferred their shareholding in a BVI company to Anjie Investments Limited ("Anjie"), itself a BVI company.

Anjie applied to strike out the Claim and, in the alternative, to stay the Claim on the grounds that the BVI Courts were not the appropriate forum for the trial of the action: rather, the Court of Hong Kong was the appropriate forum. At first instance, the Commercial Court Judge (Farara J (Ag)) disagreed with Anjie. Whilst Farara J expressed satisfaction with many of Anjie's arguments, it appeared that he was particularly swayed by the fact that the BVI

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from