Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 OCTOBER 2025

A Meeting Of Minds: The Privy Council & Duomatic Principles

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

In the recent British Virgin Islands ("BVI") appeal of Fang v Green Elite ("Green Elite"), the Privy Council reaffirmed the principle in Duomatic

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Takeaways

In the recent British Virgin Islands ("BVI") appeal of Fang v Green Elite ("Green Elite"), the Privy Council reaffirmed the principle in Duomatic1. The Privy Council restated that shareholder consent must be unanimous and, if not passed by way of formal resolution, the extent of the consent must be certain and give specific consent for a company to enter a particular transaction. The Board held that a general purpose or intent to enter a transaction is not sufficient.

Background Facts

The matter involved a joint venture between Mr. Fang, Mr. Ooijen and Mr. Leeuw (the "Principals"). The Principals decided to float the business on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and incorporated a company in the Cayman Islands to serve as the vehicle for the floatation ("CT"). The shares in CT were issued in equal numbers between two companies owned by the Principals, Delco Participation BV ("Delco") and HWH Holdings Ltd ("HWH"). As part of the floatation a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from