Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2013

Alfa v Cukurova, Part VII

Like a low budget horror film, the "Alfa v Cukurova" litigation seems to have an inexhaustible supply of sequels.

British Virgin IslandsFinance and Banking

Like a low budget horror film, the Alfa v Cukurova litigation seems to have an inexhaustible supply of sequels. However, beyond a propensity for repetition, there the parallels to low budget horror films ends (or low budget anything: the parties have spent millions of dollars in legal fees fighting for control of the US$3.3 billion BVI incorporated joint venture vehicle).  And unlike the denizens of Elm Street or Crystal Lake, the end of this series seems to have a slightly less predictable finish.

On 30 January 2013 the Privy Council handed down the seventh, and what may be the last, substantive judgment in the seemingly interminable Alfa Telecom v Cukurova litigation (report at UKPC [2013] 2). In a surprising decision, the Privy Council determined that Alfa had validly enforced the underlying share security, but awarded relief from forfeiture. The decision is likely to prove controversial. Whilst affirming the availability and exercisability of appropriation of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from