Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JULY 2026

Brazil Appeals Court Holds Pool Licence Offer Meets FRAND Obligation In Panasonic v HMD

Licks Attorneys
Licks Attorneys
Contributor
Licks Attorneys

Licks Attorneys

Licks Attorneys is one of Brazil’s most respected litigation law firms, having unparalleled...

View firm profile
Explore more from Licks Attorneys

The Rio de Janeiro Court of Appeals has issued a landmark ruling in a standard essential patent dispute between Panasonic and HMD, establishing that offering only a pool license can satisfy FRAND obligations under Brazilian law. The decision marks a significant development in Brazil's growing role as a venue for SEP licensing disputes and addresses questions about what constitutes good faith licensing behavior.

BrazilIntellectual Property
Licks Attorneys
Licks Attorneys

The Rio de Janeiro Court of Appeals has upheld a preliminary injunction against HMD in an Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) SEP case filed by Panasonic. In doing so, the Brazilian appellate court held, for the first time, that a licensor meets its FRAND obligation by offering an implementer only a pool licence.

The appeals court also called out HMD for its “uncooperative” and “delaying” conduct during the proceedings. 

As such, the ruling enriches Brazil’s FRAND case law as the country grows in popularity as a venue for SEP licensing disputes. It is also a setback for HMD, which is on the receiving end of various SEP lawsuits around the world.

Read more at: IAM

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from