Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2014

Dispute Over Jurisdiction Between CADE And BACEN Reaches An End

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The dispute between these two institutions (BC and CADE) is coming to an end.

BrazilAntitrust/Competition Law

Keywords: CADE, BACEN, Brazilian Central Bank, antitrust, mergers

On July 9th, 2014, Judge Dias Toffoli of the Brazilian Supreme Court of Justice, decided in the BCN v. Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) case (Appeal No. 664.189), that the Brazilian Central Bank (BC) has exclusive jurisdiction to analyze and rule on antitrust matters concerning mergers and acquisition transactions between financial institutions.

The dispute between these two institutions (BC and CADE) is coming to an end. It began between 2001 and 2002, when CADE recalled the jurisdiction of the analysis that the BC had been carrying out exclusively until then. The argument is that the Brazilian antitrust law (Law No. 8.884/84 at the time, but since replaced by Law No. 12.529/11) did not specify what kind of market CADE would be able to investigate, opening the opportunity for CADE to investigate all sectors and industries, including financial activities. However, Law No. 4.595/64

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from