Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2026

Intragroup Trade Name Royalties: Recent Transfer Pricing Case Law

Loyens & Loeff
Loyens & Loeff
Contributor
Loyens & Loeff

Loyens & Loeff

One firm: Law and Tax Loyens & Loeff is a leading independent, full-service law and tax firm in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Loyens & Loeff

Recent Belgian court rulings have intensified scrutiny of intellectual property transactions, particularly concerning DEMPE functions and income reallocation. A landmark judgment on trade name royalty payments establishes critical precedents for how Belgian tax authorities can apply transfer pricing principles to challenge the deductibility of such payments.

BelgiumTax

In a recent decision, a Belgian court confirmed that royalty payments made by a subsidiary for the use of a trade name are tax deductible where they serve a genuine business purpose, without requiring proof that the use of the trade name generated demonstrable or quantified value. The court distinguished the general cost deductibility rules from the transfer pricing framework, clarifying their respective scope and evidentiary standards.

The court ruling provides useful guidance on the deductibility of intellectual property‑related royalties and on the allocation of the burden of proof in Belgian transfer pricing disputes.

Key insights
  • Royalty deductibility does not require proof of an ex post quantified benefit

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from