Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2011

Vertical Agreements - European Union Level

Van Bael & Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis
Contributor
Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm headquartered in Brussels with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Van Bael & Bellis

On 15 December 2010, the General Court (the "Court") annulled a decision adopted in 2008 by the Commission which rejected a complaint by the European Confederation for Watch Repairer Associations ("CEAHR") against several Swiss manufacturers of luxury watches.

BelgiumAntitrust/Competition Law

General Court rules on market definition concerning primary products (luxury watches) and after-markets

On 15 December 2010, the General Court (the "Court") annulled a decision adopted in 2008 by the Commission which rejected a complaint by the European Confederation for Watch Repairer Associations ("CEAHR") against several Swiss manufacturers of luxury watches. In its 2004 complaint, the CEAHR had alleged, in particular, that several luxury watch manufacturers entered into an agreement or a concerted practice and committed an abuse of dominance by refusing to continue supplying spare parts to independent repairers. In the 2008 decision, the Commission rejected the complaint on the ground that there was insufficient Community interest to continue the investigation for four main reasons.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from