Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JUNE 2016

A Protected Playground For Observations Of Examiners

In a recent decision the General Court again dealt with the absolute grounds of refusal of Article 7 Para 1 lit (b) and (c).

AustriaIntellectual Property

In a recent decision[1] the General Court again dealt with the absolute grounds of refusal of Article 7 Para 1 lit (b) and (c). The decision concerned the trademark STREET applied for by Volkswagen AG. The trademark was intended to cover all kinds of vehicles on land in class 12, vehicles for children in class 28 and wholesale and retail services in class 35, all relating to motor vehicles and their parts. The examiner of the OHIM and the First Board of Appeal had rejected the trademark STREET, because in their opinion this word would be subject to the absolute grounds of refusal of non-distinctiveness and descriptiveness. This decision is in line with the practice of the OHIM and the General Court, but nevertheless, because of the clear wording in this decision, it requires several comments and remarks.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from