Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 NOVEMBER 2024

Racing Clubs Face the Superannuation Stakes

These line of cases are an important reminder of the extended meaning of employee for Superannuation purposes.

AustraliaWealth Management

In late July 2024, the AAT held that pursuant to the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 ("SG Act"), jockeys who raced at tracks owned by five race clubs between the period of 2009 to 2014 were employees of the clubs. The AAT found that due to a lack of evidence raised by the clubs, section 12(3) of the SG Act did not apply and s12(8) was the more appropriate provision to apply.

These matters was heard in five separate cases where the AAT found that all the race club taxpayers were employers of the jockeys for the purpose of the SG Act. These cases include:

  • Armidale Jockey Club v FCT [2024] AATA 2726;
  • Australian Turf Club Ltd v FCT [2024] AATA 2728;
  • Clarence River Jockey Club Ltd v FCT [2024] AATA 2729;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from