Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2017

Transport & Logistics News - March 2017: part 3

This article is part 3 of a quarterly issue covering transport and shipping cases from Australia and around the world.

AustraliaTransport

Vinnlustodin HF and Anor v Sea Tank Shipping AS (The "Aqasia") [2016] EWHC 2514 (Comm.)

This case was concerned with a claim for US$367,836 for damage suffered to a cargo of 2,000 tonnes of fish oil shipped in bulk for a lump sum freight. The carrier admitted liability but sought to limit its liability to £54,730.90 calculated with reference to the limitation of liability under Article IV Rule 5 of the Hague Rules of 100 pounds per metric tonne of cargo damaged.

It was held by Sir Jeremy Cooke in the High Court in England that the word "unit" in Article IV Rule 5 referred to a physical unit for shipment and did not mean a unit of measurement or customary freight unit. Furthermore, he held that even if "unit" was capable of applying to bulk cargoes it could only apply to a "freight unit", and because the cargo was shipped for a lump sum there was no assistance to be gained by the carrier from such an interpretation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from