Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MARCH 2015

Port of Darwin: Too much discretion for the regulator?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The Ports Management Bill vests significant discretion in the Utilities Commission, a notionally independent regulator.

AustraliaTransport

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The proposed regulatory framework for the Port of Darwin is set out in the Ports Management Bill 2014 (NT). In principle the draft Bill draws on approaches adopted in Victoria and South Australia. In doing so, it vests a significant amount of discretion in the Northern Territory Utilities Commission, a notionally independent regulator1 to make determinations about the appropriate level of regulation and potentially to set up front charges and terms and conditions. To that extent, it has the potential to be significantly more intrusive than the approach adopted in New South Wales in respect of the Port of Botany (for example), although it is not clear from the draft Bill whether price regulation is intended to displace commercial agreements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from