Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2016

Over-height vehicles: CoR consequences of a collision causing damage to road infrastructure

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Even a minor risk breach would be sufficient for a compensation order in relation to damage done by the vehicle.

AustraliaTransport

Bridges and tunnels will often have vehicle height restrictions. So what happens from a Chain of Responsibility (CoR) perspective if an over-height vehicle collides with the top of a tunnel or the underside of a bridge?

Under s 611 of the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL), a court may make a compensation order requiring a person convicted of a CoR breach to compensate the road manager for damage caused to road infrastructure as a result of the offence. In making such an order, the Court must conclude that, on the balance of probabilities, the damage was caused by – or partly caused by – the commission of the offence. However, compensation under s 611 can only be ordered when a CoR conviction has been recorded. While a vehicle and its load may be over-height in respect of a particular route, is that still a CoR breach?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from